TC/1950

Omagh accused maintains 'other people caused this disaster'

COLM Murphy, one of five men accused of carrying out the 1998 Omagh bombing, called the attack which killed 29 people a 'tragedy' and an outrage', the civil action case in Dublin heard this week, claiming that 'other people' were responsible.
Telling detectives that the 'loss of innocent lives was a disaster', Murphy reportedly maintained his innocence throughout questioning by investigating officers.
The Real IRA bomb exploded on August 15, a busy Saturday afternoon, injuring hundreds.
Alleged RIRA leader Michael McKevitt, Liam Campbell - said to be his number two - Murphy, Seamus McKenna and Seamus Daly all deny any involvement.
Former detective garda James Hanley told the Omagh civil action case in Dublin that Murphy would not condemn the attack when he was arrested in February 1999 for the unlawful possession of explosive substances in Dundalk between August 13 and August 15, 1998.
The court heard that Mr. Hanley, who has since retired, interviewed Murphy six times in Monaghan Garda Station in February 1999, during which he was told that his mobile phone signal had been picked up at a number of locations in Northern Ireland - including Omagh - on August 15.
Reading from his interview notes, Mr. Hanley said Murphy first maintained that he had his phone at all times at home, but later admitted lending it to another man.
Mr. Hanley said officers asked Murphy is he condemned the attack.
"I'm not in the business of condemning, as I said it was a tragedy," he replied.
It was claimed Murphy also told gardai that even if he got 20 years, his conscience was clear.
"I was not in Omagh, it does me good to know I wasn't there," he was reported as saying.
Murphy later told officers that the loss of innocent lives was a disaster.
"I have told you what I know," he said.
"If I could change things I would. But other people have caused this disaster."
Murphy (56) was convicted in connection with Omagh in 2002, but later had his conviction overturned following claims that two officers lied during his trial.
The £14 million action by six families is the first time that evidence from a Northern Ireland case has been heard in the Republic.
Dermot Fee, QC for Murphy, said his client's position throughout his trial was that a connection and agreement between interviewing officers had been used to manufacture admissions.
The barrister was granted leave to cross-examine Mr. Hanley and Detective Garda Kieran King, who also interviewed Murphy, when the case returns to Dublin on June 9.
The court heard that in the meantime, Mr. Fee was seeking disclosure on a number of documents in relation to a criminal case against two other gardai, who were acquitted of forging notes at an interview, and of committing perjury during Murphy's trial five years earlier.