POLICE CHIEFS CALL FOR O'LOAN TO QUIT
Police chiefs call for O'Loan to quit
POLICE Ombudsman Nuala O'Loan faced demands for her resignation last night as a new row flared over her damning assessment of the Omagh bomb inquiry.
Furious police chiefs accused her of wrongly claiming victory after a legal bid to overturn the devastating report on the investigation into the atrocity was dropped.
Police Federation chairman Irwin Montgomery said: "She ought to consider her position because of the way she has gone about her job."
Mrs O'Loan's scathing appraisal of the hunt for the Real IRA bombers - who killed 29 people and two unborn twins in August 1998 - stands after both sides seemed to reach agreement at the High Court in Belfast on Thursday.
The Ombudsman conceded that she should have given former Chief Constable Sir Ronnie Flanagan more time before she published her controversial findings in December 2001.
But she insisted: "The challenge has been withdrawn and I have been very concerned about the Omagh families over the past year, but they can now rest content that the report remains."
The Police Association, which represents senior officers and rank-and-file members, was left incensed by her interpretation.
It had applied for a judicial review of her findings, claiming her report was grossly unfair.
Her report left senior officers shocked and furious.
She claimed the inquiry had been hampered by "defective leadership, poor judgment and a lack of urgency".
Sir Ronnie was also singled out for criticism, with the Ombudsman accusing him of "seriously flawed judgment".
In the legal compromise, it was agreed that the litigation should be halted while the Ombudsman accepted senior PSNI officers should have been given more notice of the allegations against them.
More than the two weeks granted for a response before she published her findings should also have been allowed, she accepted.
But the bitter divisions erupted again yesterday as angry officers insisted the court challenge had never been about whether the Ombudsman's allegations were right.
Mr Montgomery, who also chairs the Police Association, said: "The issue at stake for the judicial review was the concern that natural justice had not been afforded to members at all levels because of the manner in which the Ombudsman went about compiling the Omagh report.
"Specifically in the settlement statement the Ombudsman conceded that, with hindsight, certain PSNI members should have been given notice of the allegations against them and a better opportunity to respond
"While the Ombudsman may have come to the same conclusion had she waited to receive all comments from the police, without these comments the report was incomplete and therefore flawed and of a lesser standard than could have been reasonably expected."
Mrs O'Loan later expressed disappointment at the Police Federation statement and insisted that the Police Association was backing her effort to improve relationships.
POLICE Ombudsman Nuala O'Loan faced demands for her resignation last night as a new row flared over her damning assessment of the Omagh bomb inquiry.
Furious police chiefs accused her of wrongly claiming victory after a legal bid to overturn the devastating report on the investigation into the atrocity was dropped.
Police Federation chairman Irwin Montgomery said: "She ought to consider her position because of the way she has gone about her job."
Mrs O'Loan's scathing appraisal of the hunt for the Real IRA bombers - who killed 29 people and two unborn twins in August 1998 - stands after both sides seemed to reach agreement at the High Court in Belfast on Thursday.
The Ombudsman conceded that she should have given former Chief Constable Sir Ronnie Flanagan more time before she published her controversial findings in December 2001.
But she insisted: "The challenge has been withdrawn and I have been very concerned about the Omagh families over the past year, but they can now rest content that the report remains."
The Police Association, which represents senior officers and rank-and-file members, was left incensed by her interpretation.
It had applied for a judicial review of her findings, claiming her report was grossly unfair.
Her report left senior officers shocked and furious.
She claimed the inquiry had been hampered by "defective leadership, poor judgment and a lack of urgency".
Sir Ronnie was also singled out for criticism, with the Ombudsman accusing him of "seriously flawed judgment".
In the legal compromise, it was agreed that the litigation should be halted while the Ombudsman accepted senior PSNI officers should have been given more notice of the allegations against them.
More than the two weeks granted for a response before she published her findings should also have been allowed, she accepted.
But the bitter divisions erupted again yesterday as angry officers insisted the court challenge had never been about whether the Ombudsman's allegations were right.
Mr Montgomery, who also chairs the Police Association, said: "The issue at stake for the judicial review was the concern that natural justice had not been afforded to members at all levels because of the manner in which the Ombudsman went about compiling the Omagh report.
"Specifically in the settlement statement the Ombudsman conceded that, with hindsight, certain PSNI members should have been given notice of the allegations against them and a better opportunity to respond
"While the Ombudsman may have come to the same conclusion had she waited to receive all comments from the police, without these comments the report was incomplete and therefore flawed and of a lesser standard than could have been reasonably expected."
Mrs O'Loan later expressed disappointment at the Police Federation statement and insisted that the Police Association was backing her effort to improve relationships.
Further Information
Publisher: NEWS LETTER
Ref: NL/512
Published Date: 25-Jan-03
Related Images
There have been no images archived for this article.